Protein target profile

VK055_0207

peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase

Genome: KpATCC43816 Gene: pth AIK78835.1 3D evidence: Experimental + ColabFold model UniProt A6TAP7

Export view

Length 194

Pocket druggability 0.769

Direct ligand evidence 0 60 total records

Functional annotation 0 EC 1 GO

Target summary

Promising target candidate with multiple supporting evidence streams.

Automated synthesis of the evidence currently loaded. Review the underlying records before prioritizing this protein.

Main supporting evidence

Experimental structure available At least one PDB experimental structure is loaded, not just a predicted model - stronger structural coverage than AlphaFold/ColabFold alone. Core gene across strains Marked as conserved by both pan-genome tools: Roary and CoreCruncher. Strong predicted binding pocket FPocket selected-pocket score 0.77. This is a computational pocket signal, not binding validation. Structure available Experimental + ColabFold model Review the complete evidence below

Risks to review

Evidence gaps

No metabolic context No SBML/network-derived reaction evidence is loaded for this protein.

Terms and data sources used on this page

PDB: experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank. These are the strongest structural evidence, but may cover only part of the protein.

AlphaFold DB model: a precomputed predicted structure downloaded from AlphaFold Database/UniProt, not an experiment performed here.

ColabFold model: a predicted structure generated for this workspace; interpret it with coverage and confidence.

pLDDT: confidence score for predicted structures. High values support local geometry; low values mean the region should not drive pocket interpretation.

FPocket / P2Rank: software tools that predict possible ligand-binding pockets on a 3D structure. They are useful screening signals, not experimental validation.

Druggability: a pocket-based estimate of whether a small molecule could bind productively. It does not mean a drug already exists.

PDB ligand: a compound observed in an experimental structure. Direct same-protein records are stronger than homolog-transferred records.

ChEMBL: a public database of measured compound bioactivity. Direct entries are stronger than entries transferred from similar proteins.

ZINC: a purchasable-compound database. Here it marks proposed candidates from chemical similarity, not measured binders.

LigQ / LigQ_2: an internal Target pipeline step that gathers PDB, ChEMBL, and ZINC ligand evidence for each protein.

Off-target: sequence similarity to proteins we prefer not to hit, such as human proteins or beneficial gut microbiome proteins.

DEG: Database of Essential Genes. A match suggests the protein resembles genes known to be essential in other organisms.

Roary / CoreCruncher: pan-genome tools used to decide whether a gene is core across analyzed strains or accessory/strain-specific.

EC / GO: functional annotations: EC describes enzyme reactions; GO describes biological process, molecular function, or cellular component.

KEGG pathway: a curated metabolic route label used here to group reactions imported from the metabolic model.

Chokepoint: a metabolic reaction that is the only producer or consumer of a metabolite in the imported model.

Prioritization evidence

Selectivity, essentiality, structural confidence, conservation, and predicted binding-site evidence.

Off-target risk

Human off-target: Hit
Human identity (%): 35.227 Lower values reduce human off-target concern.
Human E-value: 2.63e-20
Gut microbiome similarity: 4.9% of screened genomes Lower prevalence suggests narrower overlap with the screened gut microbiome.

Essentiality

Essential (DEG): Y
DEG identity (%): 91.753 Higher values support similarity to known essential genes.
DEG E-value: 1.11e-125 Smaller values mean stronger essential-gene similarity.

Localization

Localization: Cytoplasmic

Structure confidence

ColabFold pLDDT: 97.31 0-100 confidence; >70 supports local structural interpretation.

Binding-site evidence

PDB experimental structure

The selected pocket score is the FPocket value used for ranking after applying the curated structure priority. It estimates small-molecule pocket quality; it is not experimental binding evidence. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so visible pockets can differ.

FPocket 0.769

Structure 7BRD

Pocket Pocket 1

P2Rank 0.448

Structure 7BRD

Pocket Pocket 1

ColabFold model

FPocket 0.694 · Pocket 6

P2Rank 0.291 · Pocket 1

Core conservation Conserved core gene

Roary core

CoreCruncher core

Gut microbiome 231 / 4744 genomes with a hit

Prevalence 4.9%

Cross-references

External database identifiers for this protein, its structures, ligands, and metabolic reactions.

Sequence

UniProt A6TAP7

Structure

PDB 7BRD

Sequence

Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.

MTIKLIVGLANPGAEYAATRHNAGAWYVDLLADRHRAPLREESKFFGYTSRINLAGEDVRLLVPTTFMNLSGKAVAAMATFYRINPDEILVAHDELDLPPGVAKFKLGGGHGGHNGLKDIISKLGNNPNFHRLRVGIGHPGDKNKVVGFVLGKPPASEQKLIDDAVDEAARCTEIWLKDGLTKATNRLHAFKAQ

Functional annotations

Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.

1 GO

Gene Ontology (GO)

GO:0004045 Catalysis of the reaction: an N-acyl-L-alpha-aminoacyl-tRNA + H2O = an N-acyl-L-amino acid + a tRNA + H+.

Sequence domains and features

Domain and signature matches imported from InterPro and related databases.

19 records

Show feature table

Start	End	DB	Term	Name
4	175	NCBIfam	TIGR00447	aminoacyl-tRNA hydrolase
4	175	InterPro	IPR001328	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
1	194	Gene3D	G3DSA:3.40.50.1470	-
1	194	InterPro	IPR036416	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase superfamily
3	182	Hamap	MF_00083	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase [pth].
3	182	InterPro	IPR001328	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
110	120	ProSitePatterns	PS01196	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase signature 2.
110	120	InterPro	IPR018171	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase, conserved site
4	187	PANTHER	PTHR17224	PEPTIDYL-TRNA HYDROLASE
4	187	InterPro	IPR001328	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
5	177	CDD	cd00462	PTH
5	177	InterPro	IPR001328	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
16	29	ProSitePatterns	PS01195	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase signature 1.
16	29	InterPro	IPR018171	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase, conserved site
3	192	SUPERFAMILY	SSF53178	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase-like
3	192	InterPro	IPR036416	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase superfamily
1	192	FunFam	G3DSA:3.40.50.1470:FF:000001	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
5	189	Pfam	PF01195	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase
5	189	InterPro	IPR001328	Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase

3D structure

Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; AlphaFold DB and ColabFold models typically cover the full protein but remain computational predictions.

Download VMD script Full viewer

Loading 3D structure...

Drag to rotate — click the view, then scroll to zoom.

Pocket score High Medium Low

How colors and pocket overlays are used

Uniform protein color marks the displayed model as a single molecular object.

Experimental PDB structures may be colored by chain to distinguish subunits or copies present in the file.

Pocket colors and alpha spheres are evidence overlays for predicted binding cavities; they are not alternative protein chains.

'Alpha spheres' is FPocket's own cavity-shape geometry, imported when available and aligned with the loaded structure.

'Pocket atoms'/'Predicted site atoms' show the pocket's residue atoms instead: P2Rank reports residues rather than alpha spheres, and FPocket falls back to this when alpha-sphere geometry is unavailable or doesn't align.

'No pocket geometry' means neither alpha spheres nor residue-position data could be found for that pocket; the layer just highlights the same residues as 'Nearby residues'.

Pocket details Inspect a specific pocket, or open the full viewer

Binding pockets · FPocket

Druggability: high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4

Site 1 FPocket #1

0.769

Likely same site as P2Rank 2 1.5 Å 14 shared residues 93% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2

Site 1 P2Rank #1

0.448

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 2 P2Rank #2

0.249

Likely same site as FPocket 1 1.5 Å 14 shared residues 93% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 3 P2Rank #3

0.0

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2

Site 1 P2Rank #1

0.291

Likely same site as FPocket 6 4.1 Å 17 shared residues 94% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 2 P2Rank #2

0.26

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 3 P2Rank #3

0.086

Likely same site as FPocket 6 7.0 Å 12 shared residues 92% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 4 P2Rank #4

0.004

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Residue sets

UniProt: Active site:21-21 Proton acceptor

UniProt: Binding site:115-115

UniProt: Binding site:16-16

UniProt: Binding site:67-67

UniProt: Binding site:69-69

UniProt: Site:11-11 Discriminates between blocked and unblocked aminoacyl-tRNA

UniProt: Site:94-94 Stabilizes the basic form of H active site to accept a proton

All structural evidence 1 experimental · 1 predicted

Structural evidence

1 + 1

Experimental PDB entries plus predicted AlphaFold DB or ColabFold models. Click Switch to display a different loaded structure in the viewer.

Entry	Method	Resolution	Chain	Coverage	Links	Status
PDB 7BRD	X-ray	—	A	—	PDBe RCSB PDBj File	Viewing
ColabFold VK055_0207	ColabFold	—	—	full sequence	—	Loaded

Ligand evidence

Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.

60 records

Chemistry signal

Structural ligand evidence is available for this target.

Direct evidence 0 same-protein records

Transferred evidence 10 records from similar proteins

Structural ligands 10 0 loaded crystals

Measured bioactivity 0 direct and transferred ChEMBL records

Proposed compounds 50 similarity-based ZINC candidates

Best available ligand signal

0L1 PDB via homolog 146.1 Da · LogP 0.72 · TPSA 74.6 Open detail RCSB PDB

3NZ PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

5AE PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

AR3 PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

CTN PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in Target, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.

No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.

Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.

Ligand	Source crystal	UniProt (homolog)	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
0L1 RCSB PDB	4DHW	Q9HVC3	146.1 Da LogP 0.72 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C(CCC(=O)O)CC(=O)O`
3NZ RCSB PDB	4QBK	Q9HVC3	443.5 Da LogP -1.28 TPSA 183.7	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(cc1)C[C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](O[C@H]([…`
5AE RCSB PDB	4QD3	Q9HVC3	244.2 Da LogP -3.17 TPSA 143.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C1=NC(=NC(=O)N1[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)CO)…`
AR3 RCSB PDB	5Y9A	D0C9L6	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C1=CN(C(=O)N=C1N)[C@H]2[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)CO…`
CTN RCSB PDB	4JWK	D0C9L6	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C1=CN(C(=O)N=C1N)[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)C…`
FLC RCSB PDB	5ZX8	Q5SHZ2	189.1 Da LogP -5.25 TPSA 140.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C(C(=O)[O-])C(CC(=O)[O-])(C(=O)[O-])O`
PML RCSB PDB	4DJJ	Q9HVC3	160.2 Da LogP 1.11 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C(CCC(=O)O)CCC(=O)O`
POL RCSB PDB	6IX6	D0C9L6	60.1 Da LogP 0.39 TPSA 20.2	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCO`
TLA RCSB PDB	4OLJ	D0C9L6	150.1 Da LogP -2.12 TPSA 115.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`[C@@H]([C@H](C(=O)O)O)(C(=O)O)O`
URI RCSB PDB	4JX9	D0C9L6	244.2 Da LogP -2.85 TPSA 124.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C1=CN(C(=O)NC1=O)[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O2)C…`

Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.

Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

No ChEMBL hits found through similar proteins.

Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).

Ligand	Tanimoto	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
ZINC1078621 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC12336757 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC12336758 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC16969357 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC2583632 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC3795098 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c(=O)…`
ZINC3830623 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC3830624 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)…`
ZINC3978018 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC6091575 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC6234828 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC6524892 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC895248 ZINC	1.000	243.2 Da LogP -2.56 TPSA 130.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2O)c(=O)n1`
ZINC1529497 ZINC	0.917	230.3 Da LogP 3.06 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC1531045 ZINC	0.917	202.2 Da LogP 2.28 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC1593115 ZINC	0.917	216.3 Da LogP 2.67 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC1700020 ZINC	0.917	244.3 Da LogP 3.45 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC3860440 ZINC	0.917	258.4 Da LogP 3.84 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC3861298 ZINC	0.917	286.4 Da LogP 4.62 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC5113062 ZINC	0.917	272.4 Da LogP 4.23 TPSA 74.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=C(O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)O`
ZINC34085615 ZINC	0.829	242.2 Da LogP -2.60 TPSA 136.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2N)c(=O)n1`
ZINC53147178 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H…`
ZINC53147179 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]…`
ZINC58994963 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CO)O[C@@H]…`
ZINC59065899 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](n…`
ZINC59817042 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CO)O[C@H](…`
ZINC59817043 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](n3…`
ZINC59817045 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@H](n3c…`
ZINC61389312 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@@H](CO)O[C@H](…`
ZINC71789712 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]…`
ZINC73333306 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CO)O[C@H](n…`
ZINC73333309 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@@H]2[C@H](CO)O[C@@H](…`
ZINC73333313 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](n3c…`
ZINC73333316 ZINC	0.829	471.5 Da LogP -0.79 TPSA 160.9	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COc1ccc(C[C@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@H](n3cn…`
ZINC13546396 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC16952044 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC17174505 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2F)c(=O…`
ZINC17174506 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2F)c(=O)…`
ZINC2522524 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC3817231 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC57331 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)…`
ZINC5758597 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC5758598 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2F)c(=O)…`
ZINC59201305 ZINC	0.810	245.2 Da LogP -1.59 TPSA 110.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H]2F)c(=O)n1`
ZINC4824413 ZINC	0.806	413.4 Da LogP -1.29 TPSA 174.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@…`
ZINC4824417 ZINC	0.806	413.4 Da LogP -1.29 TPSA 174.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@…`
ZINC4824420 ZINC	0.806	413.4 Da LogP -1.29 TPSA 174.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@…`
ZINC4824422 ZINC	0.806	413.4 Da LogP -1.29 TPSA 174.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H…`
ZINC195751891 ZINC	0.800	246.2 Da LogP -1.87 TPSA 104.5	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O=c1ccn([C@@H]2O[C@@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2F)c(=O)…`
ZINC34248200 ZINC	0.800	243.2 Da LogP -2.89 TPSA 130.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`N[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1n1ccc(=O)[nH]c1=O`

PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.