KpATCC43816 Protein target profile

hydrogenase 3 and formate hydrogenlyase complex,HycG subunit

Accession: VK055_4458

Gene: AIK83001.1 3D evidence: AlphaFold DB model + ColabFold model Metabolism 2 reactions UniProt A0A0H3GWP2

Export view

Length 255

Pocket druggability (P2Rank · AlphaFold DB model) 0.232

Metabolic reactions 2

Chokepoint No

Direct ligand evidence 0 61 total records

Functional annotation 0 EC 5 GO

Target summary

Promising target candidate with multiple supporting evidence streams.

Automated synthesis of the evidence currently loaded. Review the underlying records before prioritizing this protein.

Main supporting evidence

Central metabolic position More central than 88.3% of genes in this genome. No isoenzyme backup detected Imported GPR rules do not show an alternative enzyme for the catalyzed reaction set. Core gene across strains Marked as conserved by both pan-genome tools: Roary and CoreCruncher. Moderate predicted binding pocket FPocket selected-pocket score 0.43. This supports review but is not experimental validation. Review the complete evidence below

Risks to review

Evidence coverage

Core evidence streams are available for this target.

Terms and data sources used on this page

PDB: experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank. These are the strongest structural evidence, but may cover only part of the protein.

AlphaFold DB model: a precomputed predicted structure downloaded from AlphaFold Database/UniProt, not an experiment performed here.

ColabFold model: a predicted structure generated for this workspace; interpret it with coverage and confidence.

pLDDT: confidence score for predicted structures. High values support local geometry; low values mean the region should not drive pocket interpretation.

FPocket / P2Rank: software tools that predict possible ligand-binding pockets on a 3D structure. They are useful screening signals, not experimental validation.

Druggability: a pocket-based estimate of whether a small molecule could bind productively. It does not mean a drug already exists.

PDB ligand: a compound observed in an experimental structure. Direct same-protein records are stronger than homolog-transferred records.

ChEMBL: a public database of measured compound bioactivity. Direct entries are stronger than entries transferred from similar proteins.

ZINC: a purchasable-compound database. Here it marks proposed candidates from chemical similarity, not measured binders.

LigQ / LigQ_2: an internal Target pipeline step that gathers PDB, ChEMBL, and ZINC ligand evidence for each protein.

Off-target: sequence similarity to proteins we prefer not to hit, such as human proteins or beneficial gut microbiome proteins.

DEG: Database of Essential Genes. A match suggests the protein resembles genes known to be essential in other organisms.

Roary / CoreCruncher: pan-genome tools used to decide whether a gene is core across analyzed strains or accessory/strain-specific.

EC / GO: functional annotations: EC describes enzyme reactions; GO describes biological process, molecular function, or cellular component.

KEGG pathway: a curated metabolic route label used here to group reactions imported from the metabolic model.

Chokepoint: a metabolic reaction that is the only producer or consumer of a metabolite in the imported model.

Prioritization evidence

Selectivity, essentiality, structural confidence, conservation, and predicted binding-site evidence.

Off-target risk

Human off-target: Hit
Human identity (%): 37.086 Lower values reduce human off-target concern.
Human E-value: 9.65e-28
Gut microbiome similarity: 10.6% of screened genomes Lower prevalence suggests narrower overlap with the screened gut microbiome.

Essentiality

Essential (DEG): N
DEG identity (%): 44.444 Higher values support similarity to known essential genes.

Structure confidence

ColabFold pLDDT: 94.99 0-100 confidence; >70 supports local structural interpretation.

Binding-site evidence

AlphaFold DB / UniProt model

P2Rank's binding-site probability is the primary druggability signal shown across the app; FPocket's druggability score is shown alongside it for comparison. Both estimate small-molecule pocket quality after applying the curated structure priority — neither is experimental binding evidence. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so visible pockets can differ.

Druggability (P2Rank) 0.232

Structure A0A0H3GWP2

Pocket Pocket 1

Druggability (FPocket) 0.429

Structure A0A0H3GWP2

Pocket Pocket 7

ColabFold model

P2Rank 0.096 · Pocket 1

FPocket 0.516 · Pocket 1

Core conservation Conserved core gene

Roary core

CoreCruncher core

Gut microbiome 505 / 4744 genomes with a hit

Prevalence 10.6%

Metabolic context

Reactions catalyzed, pathway membership, and centrality in the genome-scale metabolic network.

Explore metabolic network

Metabolic context: more central than 88.3% of genes in this genome.

Relative network centrality 88.3% more central than 88.3% of genes in this genome

Chokepoint Not a chokepoint

Imported from KpATCC43816.sbml · 2026-07-09

Sequence

Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.

MSTLLGPRDENGIPVPMTVDESIASMKASLLKKIKRSAYVYRVDCGGCNGCEIEIFATLSPLFDAERFGIKVVPSPRHADILLFTGAVTRAMRSPALRAWQSAPDPKICISYGACGNSGGIFHDLYCVWGGTDKIVPVDVYIPGCPPTPAATLYGFAMALGLLEQKIHARLPGELDEQPTELLHADMVQPLRVRIDREARRLAGYRYGRQIADDYMRLLGQGDSQVLRWLEAEKDPRLTEIVTHLNQVVEGARIR

Functional annotations

Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.

5 GO

Subcellular localization

Localization: CytoplasmicMembrane

Gene Ontology (GO)

GO:0051536 Binding to an iron-sulfur cluster, a combination of iron and sulfur atoms.
GO:0051539 Binding to a 4 iron, 4 sulfur (4Fe-4S) cluster; this cluster consists of four iron atoms, with the inorganic sulfur atoms found between the irons and acting as bridging ligands.
GO:0048038 Binding to a quinone, any member of a class of diketones derivable from aromatic compounds by conversion of two CH groups into CO groups with any necessary rearrangement of double bonds.
GO:0008137 Catalysis of the reaction: NADH + ubiquinone + 5 H+(in) = NAD+ + ubiquinol + 4 H+(out).
GO:0046872 Binding to a metal ion.

Sequence domains and features

Domain and signature matches imported from InterPro and related databases.

7 records

Show feature table

Start	End	DB	Term	Name
18	180	Gene3D	G3DSA:3.40.50.12280	-
4	174	PANTHER	PTHR42989	HYDROGENASE-4 COMPONENT I
131	147	ProSitePatterns	PS01150	Respiratory-chain NADH dehydrogenase 20 Kd subunit signature.
131	147	InterPro	IPR006138	NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, 20 Kd subunit
36	169	SUPERFAMILY	SSF56770	HydA/Nqo6-like
48	157	Pfam	PF01058	NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase, 20 Kd subunit
48	157	InterPro	IPR006137	NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase-like, 20kDa subunit

3D structure

Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; AlphaFold DB and ColabFold models typically cover the full protein but remain computational predictions.

Download VMD script Full viewer

Loading 3D structure...

Drag to rotate — click the view, then scroll to zoom.

Pocket score High Medium Low

How colors and pocket overlays are used

Uniform protein color marks the displayed model as a single molecular object.

Experimental PDB structures may be colored by chain to distinguish subunits or copies present in the file.

Pocket colors and alpha spheres are evidence overlays for predicted binding cavities; they are not alternative protein chains.

'Alpha spheres' is FPocket's own cavity-shape geometry, imported when available and aligned with the loaded structure.

'Pocket atoms'/'Predicted site atoms' show the pocket's residue atoms instead: P2Rank reports residues rather than alpha spheres, and FPocket falls back to this when alpha-sphere geometry is unavailable or doesn't align.

'No pocket geometry' means neither alpha spheres nor residue-position data could be found for that pocket; the layer just highlights the same residues as 'Nearby residues'.

Pocket details Inspect a specific pocket, or open the full viewer

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Druggability (P2Rank): high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2

Pocket 1 P2Rank #1

0.232

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Pocket 2 P2Rank #2

0.033

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Pocket 3 P2Rank #3

0.031

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Pocket 4 P2Rank #4

0.016

Likely same site as FPocket 12 2.1 Å 7 shared residues 100% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Binding pockets · FPocket

Druggability (FPocket): high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4

Pocket 1 FPocket #7

0.429

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Pocket 2 FPocket #12

0.283

Likely same site as P2Rank 4 2.1 Å 7 shared residues 100% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

All structural evidence 0 experimental · 2 predicted

Structural evidence

0 + 2

Experimental PDB entries plus predicted AlphaFold DB or ColabFold models. Click Switch to display a different loaded structure in the viewer.

Entry	Method	Resolution	Chain	Coverage	Links	Status
AlphaFold DB AF_A0A0H3GWP2	AlphaFold DB	—	—	full sequence	—	Viewing
ColabFold VK055_4458	ColabFold	—	—	full sequence	—	Loaded

Ligand evidence

Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.

61 records

Chemistry signal

Structural and bioactivity evidence are both available for this target.

Direct evidence 0 same-protein records

Transferred evidence 11 records from similar proteins

Structural ligands 10 0 loaded crystals

Measured bioactivity 1 direct and transferred ChEMBL records

Proposed compounds 50 similarity-based ZINC candidates

Best available ligand signal

3PE PDB via homolog 748.1 Da · LogP 12.06 · TPSA 134.4 Open detail RCSB PDB

8Q1 PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

CDL PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

EHZ PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

FES PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in Target, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.

No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.

Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.

Ligand	Source crystal	UniProt (homolog)	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
3PE RCSB PDB	6QC5	W5PPP6	748.1 Da LogP 12.06 TPSA 134.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OCCN)OC…`
8Q1 RCSB PDB	5XTB	O75251	540.7 Da LogP 3.29 TPSA 162.3	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@@H](C(C)(C)…`
CDL RCSB PDB	6G2J	Q9DC70	1464.1 Da LogP 23.31 TPSA 242.6	3 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)([O-])OCC(…`
EHZ RCSB PDB	6G2J	Q9DC70	584.7 Da LogP 3.04 TPSA 182.5	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCC[C@@H](CC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@@H]…`
FES RCSB PDB	6X89	A0A1S3U8J5	175.8 Da LogP 1.29 TPSA 0.0	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`S1[Fe]S[Fe]1`
NFU RCSB PDB	6CFW	Q8U0Z8	195.6 Da LogP -0.25 TPSA 64.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C(=O)[Fe](C#N)(C#N)[Ni]`
PC1 RCSB PDB	6G2J	Q9DC70	790.2 Da LogP 12.17 TPSA 111.2	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)([O-])…`
PEE RCSB PDB	5XTH	O75251	744.0 Da LogP 11.61 TPSA 134.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OCCN…`
PLX RCSB PDB	5XTD	O75251	767.1 Da LogP 11.61 TPSA 114.7	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC[C@@H](O)O[C@H](CO[C@@H](CCCCC…`
ZMP RCSB PDB	6QC5	W5PPP6	568.7 Da LogP 4.07 TPSA 162.3	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@H](C(C)(C…`

Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.

Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

Ligand	UniProt (homolog)	pchembl	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
DXH ChEMBL	O75251	8.51 ~3.1 nM	503.5 Da LogP 5.75 TPSA 97.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Cc1ccc(cc1Nc2c3cnn(c3nc(n2)c4cccnc4)C)C(=O)Nc5c…`

Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).

Ligand	Tanimoto	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
ZINC102190506 ZINC	1.000	467.5 Da LogP 4.25 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CC…`
ZINC102190512 ZINC	1.000	467.5 Da LogP 4.25 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)C…`
ZINC27416437 ZINC	0.976	411.4 Da LogP 2.69 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC33902364 ZINC	0.976	411.4 Da LogP 2.69 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CCC…`
ZINC13544781 ZINC	0.780	482.6 Da LogP 4.22 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C…`
ZINC13544783 ZINC	0.780	482.6 Da LogP 4.22 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC13543439 ZINC	0.760	454.5 Da LogP 3.44 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC13543441 ZINC	0.760	454.5 Da LogP 3.44 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)O…`
ZINC102190945 ZINC	0.739	411.5 Da LogP 3.29 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840692 ZINC	0.739	425.5 Da LogP 3.68 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840693 ZINC	0.739	425.5 Da LogP 3.68 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840704 ZINC	0.739	453.6 Da LogP 4.46 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840705 ZINC	0.739	453.6 Da LogP 4.46 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC95635984 ZINC	0.739	397.4 Da LogP 2.90 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC102191119 ZINC	0.729	498.6 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 148.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@@H](O)CO…`
ZINC58649551 ZINC	0.729	498.6 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 148.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@H](O)CO)…`
ZINC36178999 ZINC	0.727	424.5 Da LogP 4.27 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC36179002 ZINC	0.727	424.5 Da LogP 4.27 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC13543394 ZINC	0.708	455.4 Da LogP 2.15 TPSA 171.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@H](N)C(=O)…`
ZINC33822387 ZINC	0.706	426.5 Da LogP 2.66 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)O…`
ZINC33822389 ZINC	0.706	426.5 Da LogP 2.66 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC5820131 ZINC	0.705	368.4 Da LogP 2.71 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC5820134 ZINC	0.705	368.4 Da LogP 2.71 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC1501016364 ZINC	0.654	465.6 Da LogP 4.63 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O…`
ZINC12834352 ZINC	0.635	398.4 Da LogP 1.88 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)OC…`
ZINC12834353 ZINC	0.635	398.4 Da LogP 1.88 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)OC(…`
ZINC4521879 ZINC	0.634	386.5 Da LogP 4.73 TPSA 78.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OCC(COC(=O)CCCCC)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC102189757 ZINC	0.582	454.6 Da LogP 4.04 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+…`
ZINC13544128 ZINC	0.582	370.4 Da LogP 1.70 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C…`
ZINC14880038 ZINC	0.582	440.5 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC14880039 ZINC	0.582	440.5 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC15297567 ZINC	0.582	468.6 Da LogP 4.43 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[…`
ZINC32789157 ZINC	0.582	412.5 Da LogP 2.87 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C…`
ZINC32789161 ZINC	0.582	412.5 Da LogP 2.87 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)…`
ZINC32822149 ZINC	0.582	468.6 Da LogP 4.43 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+…`
ZINC32822162 ZINC	0.582	482.6 Da LogP 4.82 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC…`
ZINC32822163 ZINC	0.582	482.6 Da LogP 4.82 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N…`
ZINC44305349 ZINC	0.582	454.6 Da LogP 4.04 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N…`
ZINC44405718 ZINC	0.582	398.5 Da LogP 2.48 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C…`
ZINC44405722 ZINC	0.582	426.5 Da LogP 3.26 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC85576534 ZINC	0.582	384.4 Da LogP 2.09 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)…`
ZINC36079847 ZINC	0.578	344.5 Da LogP 4.15 TPSA 72.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC8214428 ZINC	0.578	344.5 Da LogP 4.15 TPSA 72.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC13521162 ZINC	0.574	299.2 Da LogP -0.43 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(C)=O`
ZINC3798545 ZINC	0.574	299.2 Da LogP -0.43 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(C)=O`
ZINC4521911 ZINC	0.571	344.4 Da LogP 3.56 TPSA 78.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OCC(COC(=O)CCCC)OC(=O)CCCC`
ZINC13507210 ZINC	0.564	356.4 Da LogP 1.31 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C`
ZINC53683910 ZINC	0.560	484.6 Da LogP 3.86 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[…`
ZINC62592204 ZINC	0.560	484.6 Da LogP 3.86 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC…`
ZINC96094841 ZINC	0.560	456.5 Da LogP 3.08 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C…`

PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.

Cross-references

External database identifiers for this protein, its structures, ligands, and metabolic reactions.

hydrogenase 3 and formate hydrogenlyase complex,HycG subunit

Promising target candidate with multiple supporting evidence streams.

Main supporting evidence

Risks to review

Evidence coverage

Prioritization evidence

Off-target risk

Essentiality

Structure confidence

Binding-site evidence

Metabolic context

Sequence

Functional annotations

Subcellular localization

Gene Ontology (GO)

Sequence domains and features

3D structure

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Binding pockets · FPocket

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Binding pockets · FPocket

Structural evidence

Ligand evidence

Cross-references

Sequence

Chemistry

Pathways