Target candidate with partial support; inspect missing evidence before prioritizing.
Automated synthesis of the evidence currently loaded. Review the underlying records before prioritizing this protein.
Main supporting evidence
Risks to review
Terms and data sources used on this page
PDB: experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank. These are the strongest structural evidence, but may cover only part of the protein.
AlphaFold DB model: a precomputed predicted structure downloaded from AlphaFold Database/UniProt, not an experiment performed here.
ColabFold model: a predicted structure generated for this workspace; interpret it with coverage and confidence.
pLDDT: confidence score for predicted structures. High values support local geometry; low values mean the region should not drive pocket interpretation.
FPocket / P2Rank: software tools that predict possible ligand-binding pockets on a 3D structure. They are useful screening signals, not experimental validation.
Druggability: a pocket-based estimate of whether a small molecule could bind productively. It does not mean a drug already exists.
PDB ligand: a compound observed in an experimental structure. Direct same-protein records are stronger than homolog-transferred records.
ChEMBL: a public database of measured compound bioactivity. Direct entries are stronger than entries transferred from similar proteins.
ZINC: a purchasable-compound database. Here it marks proposed candidates from chemical similarity, not measured binders.
LigQ / LigQ_2: an internal Target pipeline step that gathers PDB, ChEMBL, and ZINC ligand evidence for each protein.
Off-target: sequence similarity to proteins we prefer not to hit, such as human proteins or beneficial gut microbiome proteins.
DEG: Database of Essential Genes. A match suggests the protein resembles genes known to be essential in other organisms.
Roary / CoreCruncher: pan-genome tools used to decide whether a gene is core across analyzed strains or accessory/strain-specific.
EC / GO: functional annotations: EC describes enzyme reactions; GO describes biological process, molecular function, or cellular component.
KEGG pathway: a curated metabolic route label used here to group reactions imported from the metabolic model.
Chokepoint: a metabolic reaction that is the only producer or consumer of a metabolite in the imported model.
Prioritization evidence
Selectivity, essentiality, structural confidence, conservation, and predicted binding-site evidence.
Off-target risk
- Human off-target
- No hit
- Gut microbiome off-target
- Hit
Essentiality
- Essential (DEG)
- N
Localization
- Localization
- Cytoplasmic
Binding-site evidence
The selected pocket score is the FPocket value used for ranking after applying the curated structure priority. It estimates small-molecule pocket quality; it is not experimental binding evidence. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so visible pockets can differ.
Sequence
Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.
MTPPKLIIFDWDGTLADTTQPIIDTMRRSFAECGFPPPEAERVRSLIGYSLPEIIRALLEMPSEAAVADIARTYSAHYLNPNNRNMTLFPDALPCLDKLKAQGFRLAVATGKGRAGLDNAISQTATGGYWLATACAGEYPSKPSPEMVFGLCGELGLDPKEALVVGDTAHDLHMAANAGAAAVGVATGAHSREQLLGAPHLAVLDGLSELPGFLARHYA
Functional annotations
Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.
Gene Ontology (GO)
3- GO:0005829 The part of the cytoplasm that does not contain organelles but which does contain other particulate matter, such as protein complexes.
- GO:0008967 Catalysis of the reaction: 2-phosphoglycolate + H2O = glycolate + phosphate.
- GO:0006281 The process of restoring DNA after damage. Genomes are subject to damage by chemical and physical agents in the environment (e.g. UV and ionizing radiations, chemical mutagens, fungal and bacterial toxins, etc.) and by free radicals or alkylating agents endogenously generated in metabolism. DNA is also damaged because of errors during its replication. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported that include direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, photoreactivation, bypass, double-strand break repair pathway, and mismatch repair pathway.
Sequence domains and features
Domain and signature matches imported from InterPro and related databases.
Show feature table
| Start | End | DB | Term | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212 | PANTHER | PTHR43434 | PHOSPHOGLYCOLATE PHOSPHATASE |
| 7 | 185 | Pfam | PF13419 | Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase |
| 7 | 185 | InterPro | IPR041492 | Haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase |
| 133 | 179 | NCBIfam | TIGR01549 | HAD-IA family hydrolase |
| 133 | 179 | InterPro | IPR006439 | HAD hydrolase, subfamily IA |
| 4 | 215 | SFLD | SFLDG01135 | C1.5.6: HAD, Beta-PGM, Phosphatase Like |
| 4 | 215 | SFLD | SFLDG01129 | C1.5: HAD, Beta-PGM, Phosphatase Like |
| 5 | 214 | SUPERFAMILY | SSF56784 | HAD-like |
| 5 | 214 | InterPro | IPR036412 | HAD-like superfamily |
| 19 | 83 | Gene3D | G3DSA:1.10.150.240 | Putative phosphatase; domain 2 |
| 19 | 83 | InterPro | IPR023198 | Phosphoglycolate phosphatase-like, domain 2 |
| 7 | 199 | Gene3D | G3DSA:3.40.50.1000 | - |
| 7 | 199 | InterPro | IPR023214 | HAD superfamily |
3D structure
Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; AlphaFold DB and ColabFold models typically cover the full protein but remain computational predictions.
How colors and pocket overlays are used
Pocket details Inspect a specific pocket, or open the full viewer
- Method
- -
- Score
- -
- Visible layer
- -
- Residues
- -
- Pocket properties
- -
Selecting a pocket opens its details and centers the viewer without clearing other active layers. Use Focus this pocket when you want to hide the rest; use Surface for the wider residue environment.
Binding pockets · FPocket
Druggability: high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4
Binding pockets · P2Rank
Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2
All structural evidence
Structural evidence
0 + 1Experimental PDB entries plus predicted AlphaFold DB or ColabFold models. Click Switch to display a different loaded structure in the viewer.
| Entry | Method | Resolution | Chain | Coverage | Links | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AlphaFold DB
HT085_RS00385
|
AlphaFold DB | — | — | full sequence | — | Viewing |
Ligand evidence
Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.
Structural ligand evidence is available for this target.
Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in Target, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.
No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.
Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.
| Ligand | Source crystal | UniProt (homolog) | MW · LogP · TPSA | Lipinski | PAINS | SMILES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALF RCSB PDB | P71447 | 103.0 Da LogP 1.30 TPSA 0.0 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
F[Al-](F)(F)F
|
|
| BEF RCSB PDB | P71447 | 66.0 Da LogP 0.88 TPSA 0.0 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
[Be-](F)(F)F
|
|
| BO3 RCSB PDB | B6SEG4 | 61.8 Da LogP -2.05 TPSA 60.7 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
B(O)(O)O
|
|
| ESA RCSB PDB | O31156 | 110.1 Da LogP -0.11 TPSA 54.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCS(=O)(=O)O
|
|
| MGF RCSB PDB | P71447 | 81.3 Da LogP 0.88 TPSA 0.0 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
F[Mg-](F)F
|
|
| POA RCSB PDB | O31156 | 124.0 Da LogP -0.64 TPSA 74.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
C(C=O)P(=O)(O)O
|
|
| UVW RCSB PDB | P71447 | 140.0 Da LogP -0.36 TPSA 83.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CC(=O)OP(=O)(O)O
|
|
| VO4 RCSB PDB | Q8TBE9 | 114.9 Da LogP -3.69 TPSA 86.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
[O-][V](=O)([O-])[O-]
|
|
| VSO RCSB PDB | O31156 | 108.1 Da LogP 0.02 TPSA 54.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
C=CS(=O)(=O)O
|
|
| WO4 RCSB PDB | O31156 | 247.8 Da LogP -2.62 TPSA 80.3 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
[O-][W](=O)(=O)[O-]
|
Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).
No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.
Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).
No ChEMBL hits found through similar proteins.
Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).
| Ligand | Tanimoto | MW · LogP · TPSA | Lipinski | PAINS | SMILES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZINC1532902 ZINC | 0.700 | 206.2 Da LogP -0.86 TPSA 132.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)CC[C@@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC2018106 ZINC | 0.700 | 206.2 Da LogP -0.86 TPSA 132.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)CC[C@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3593496 ZINC | 0.652 | 206.2 Da LogP -1.16 TPSA 121.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COC(=O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3593497 ZINC | 0.652 | 206.2 Da LogP -1.16 TPSA 121.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COC(=O)C[C@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC14686440 ZINC | 0.625 | 436.4 Da LogP -2.64 TPSA 247.9 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)C[C@](O)(CC(=O)NCCCCNC(=O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O…
|
| ZINC14686442 ZINC | 0.625 | 436.4 Da LogP -2.64 TPSA 247.9 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O)NCCCCNC(=O)C[C@](O)(CC(=O…
|
| ZINC14686444 ZINC | 0.625 | 436.4 Da LogP -2.64 TPSA 247.9 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O)NCCCCNC(=O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=…
|
| ZINC13398039 ZINC | 0.577 | 234.2 Da LogP -0.38 TPSA 121.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CC(C)OC(=O)C[C@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC2528012 ZINC | 0.577 | 234.2 Da LogP -0.38 TPSA 121.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CC(C)OC(=O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC146315135 ZINC | 0.560 | 204.2 Da LogP 0.86 TPSA 94.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCCCC[C@@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC146315336 ZINC | 0.560 | 204.2 Da LogP 0.86 TPSA 94.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCCCC[C@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC1850353 ZINC | 0.556 | 206.1 Da LogP -0.86 TPSA 132.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)CC(O)(CC(=O)O)CC(=O)O
|
| ZINC13398014 ZINC | 0.522 | 220.2 Da LogP -1.07 TPSA 110.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COC(=O)CC(O)(CC(=O)OC)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3861629 ZINC | 0.522 | 206.1 Da LogP -1.16 TPSA 121.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COC(=O)C(O)(CC(=O)O)CC(=O)O
|
| ZINC100969993 ZINC | 0.500 | 359.5 Da LogP 2.70 TPSA 123.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCCCCCCCCCCCNC(=O)C[C@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC100969996 ZINC | 0.500 | 359.5 Da LogP 2.70 TPSA 123.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCCCCCCCCCCCNC(=O)C[C@@](O)(CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC1711854 ZINC | 0.500 | 248.2 Da LogP -0.13 TPSA 149.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
O=C(O)CC(CC(=O)O)(CC(=O)O)CC(=O)O
|
PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.