Strong target candidate with converging metabolic, structural and chemical evidence.
Automated synthesis of the evidence currently loaded. Review the underlying records before prioritizing this protein.
Main supporting evidence
Risks to review
Evidence coverage
Terms and data sources used on this page
PDB: experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank. These are the strongest structural evidence, but may cover only part of the protein.
AlphaFold DB model: a precomputed predicted structure downloaded from AlphaFold Database/UniProt, not an experiment performed here.
ColabFold model: a predicted structure generated for this workspace; interpret it with coverage and confidence.
pLDDT: confidence score for predicted structures. High values support local geometry; low values mean the region should not drive pocket interpretation.
FPocket / P2Rank: software tools that predict possible ligand-binding pockets on a 3D structure. They are useful screening signals, not experimental validation.
Druggability: a pocket-based estimate of whether a small molecule could bind productively. It does not mean a drug already exists.
PDB ligand: a compound observed in an experimental structure. Direct same-protein records are stronger than homolog-transferred records.
ChEMBL: a public database of measured compound bioactivity. Direct entries are stronger than entries transferred from similar proteins.
ZINC: a purchasable-compound database. Here it marks proposed candidates from chemical similarity, not measured binders.
LigQ / LigQ_2: an internal Target pipeline step that gathers PDB, ChEMBL, and ZINC ligand evidence for each protein.
Off-target: sequence similarity to proteins we prefer not to hit, such as human proteins or beneficial gut microbiome proteins.
DEG: Database of Essential Genes. A match suggests the protein resembles genes known to be essential in other organisms.
Roary / CoreCruncher: pan-genome tools used to decide whether a gene is core across analyzed strains or accessory/strain-specific.
EC / GO: functional annotations: EC describes enzyme reactions; GO describes biological process, molecular function, or cellular component.
KEGG pathway: a curated metabolic route label used here to group reactions imported from the metabolic model.
Chokepoint: a metabolic reaction that is the only producer or consumer of a metabolite in the imported model.
Prioritization evidence
Selectivity, essentiality, structural confidence, conservation, and predicted binding-site evidence.
Off-target risk
- Human off-target
- No hit
- Gut microbiome similarity
- 4.0% of screened genomes Lower prevalence suggests narrower overlap with the screened gut microbiome.
Essentiality
- Essential (DEG)
- Y
- DEG identity (%)
- 95.604 Higher values support similarity to known essential genes.
- DEG E-value
- 0.0 Smaller values mean stronger essential-gene similarity.
Localization
- Localization
- Cytoplasmic
Structure confidence
- ColabFold pLDDT
- 95.44 0-100 confidence; >70 supports local structural interpretation.
Binding-site evidence
PDB experimental structureThe selected pocket score is the FPocket value used for ranking after applying the curated structure priority. It estimates small-molecule pocket quality; it is not experimental binding evidence. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so visible pockets can differ.
Cross-references
External database identifiers for this protein, its structures, ligands, and metabolic reactions.
Sequence
Structure
Pathways
Sequence
Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.
MPCEELDIVWNNIKAEARALADCEPMLASFYHATLLKHENLGSALSYMLANKLASPIMPAIAIREVVEEAYAADPEMIASAACDIQAVRTRDPAVDKYSTPLLYLKGFHALQAYRIGHWLWTQGRRALAIFLQNQVSVSFQVDIHPAAKIGRGIMLDHATGIVVGETAVIEDDVSILQSVTLGGTGKTSGDRHPKIREGVMIGAGAKILGNIEVGRGAKIGAGSVVLQPVPPHTTAAGVPARIVGKPESDKPAMDMDQHFNGIHHTFEYGDGI
Functional annotations
Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.
Gene Ontology (GO)
4- GO:0009001 Catalysis of the reaction: L-serine + acetyl-CoA = O-acetyl-L-serine + CoA.
- GO:0005737 The contents of a cell excluding the plasma membrane and nucleus, but including other subcellular structures.
- GO:0006535 OBSOLETE. The chemical reactions and pathways resulting in the formation of cysteine from L- serine.
- GO:0016740 Catalysis of the transfer of a group, e.g. a methyl group, glycosyl group, acyl group, phosphorus-containing, or other groups, from one compound (generally regarded as the donor) to another compound (generally regarded as the acceptor). Transferase is the systematic name for any enzyme of EC class 2.
Sequence domains and features
Domain and signature matches imported from InterPro and related databases.
Show feature table
| Start | End | DB | Term | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 240 | CDD | cd03354 | LbH_SAT |
| 140 | 240 | InterPro | IPR045304 | Serine acetyltransferase, LbH domain |
| 202 | 230 | ProSitePatterns | PS00101 | Hexapeptide-repeat containing-transferases signature. |
| 202 | 230 | InterPro | IPR018357 | Hexapeptide transferase, conserved site |
| 193 | 226 | Pfam | PF00132 | Bacterial transferase hexapeptide (six repeats) |
| 193 | 226 | InterPro | IPR001451 | Hexapeptide repeat |
| 9 | 113 | SMART | SM00971 | SATase_N_2_a |
| 9 | 113 | InterPro | IPR010493 | Serine acetyltransferase, N-terminal |
| 143 | 273 | Gene3D | G3DSA:2.160.10.10 | Hexapeptide repeat proteins |
| 143 | 264 | FunFam | G3DSA:2.160.10.10:FF:000002 | Serine acetyltransferase |
| 4 | 260 | SUPERFAMILY | SSF51161 | Trimeric LpxA-like enzymes |
| 4 | 260 | InterPro | IPR011004 | Trimeric LpxA-like superfamily |
| 9 | 113 | Pfam | PF06426 | Serine acetyltransferase, N-terminal |
| 1 | 142 | Gene3D | G3DSA:1.10.3130.10 | serine acetyltransferase, domain 1 |
| 1 | 142 | InterPro | IPR042122 | Serine acetyltransferase, N-terminal domain superfamily |
| 4 | 258 | PANTHER | PTHR42811 | SERINE ACETYLTRANSFERASE |
| 1 | 142 | FunFam | G3DSA:1.10.3130.10:FF:000001 | Acetyltransferase |
| 82 | 242 | NCBIfam | TIGR01172 | serine O-acetyltransferase |
| 82 | 242 | InterPro | IPR005881 | Serine O-acetyltransferase |
3D structure
Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; AlphaFold DB and ColabFold models typically cover the full protein but remain computational predictions.
How colors and pocket overlays are used
Pocket details Inspect a specific pocket, or open the full viewer
- Method
- -
- Score
- -
- Visible layer
- -
- Residues
- -
- Pocket properties
- -
Selecting a pocket opens its details and centers the viewer without clearing other active layers. Use Focus this pocket when you want to hide the rest; use Surface for the wider residue environment.
Binding pockets · FPocket
Druggability: high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4
Binding pockets · P2Rank
Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2
Binding pockets · FPocket
Druggability: high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4
Binding pockets · P2Rank
Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2
All structural evidence
Structural evidence
1 + 1Experimental PDB entries plus predicted AlphaFold DB or ColabFold models. Click Switch to display a different loaded structure in the viewer.
Ligand evidence
Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.
Structural ligand evidence is available for this target.
Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in Target, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.
No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.
Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.
| Ligand | Source crystal | UniProt (homolog) | MW · LogP · TPSA | Lipinski | PAINS | SMILES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15P RCSB PDB | A0A0F6AR69 | 1529.8 Da LogP 0.17 TPSA 334.1 | 2 viol. | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO…
|
|
| OAS RCSB PDB | P29847 | 147.1 Da LogP -1.04 TPSA 89.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CC(=O)OC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N
|
|
| PG5 RCSB PDB | A0A2U2H3H7 | 178.2 Da LogP 0.31 TPSA 36.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOC
|
Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).
No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.
Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).
No ChEMBL hits found through similar proteins.
Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).
| Ligand | Tanimoto | MW · LogP · TPSA | Lipinski | PAINS | SMILES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZINC1580161 ZINC | 1.000 | 208.3 Da LogP -0.33 TPSA 57.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC16052118 ZINC | 1.000 | 340.4 Da LogP -0.28 TPSA 84.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC16052257 ZINC | 1.000 | 384.5 Da LogP -0.26 TPSA 94.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC34317654 ZINC | 1.000 | 472.6 Da LogP -0.23 TPSA 112.5 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC44076059 ZINC | 1.000 | 428.5 Da LogP -0.24 TPSA 103.3 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC5210101 ZINC | 1.000 | 252.3 Da LogP -0.31 TPSA 66.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC5997860 ZINC | 1.000 | 296.4 Da LogP -0.29 TPSA 75.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC575419714 ZINC | 0.727 | 312.4 Da LogP 0.42 TPSA 66.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCSCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC115163232 ZINC | 0.700 | 222.3 Da LogP 0.07 TPSA 57.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCCO
|
| ZINC258837490 ZINC | 0.700 | 354.4 Da LogP 0.11 TPSA 84.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCCO
|
| ZINC1692489 ZINC | 0.688 | 222.3 Da LogP 0.33 TPSA 46.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC4530388 ZINC | 0.688 | 266.3 Da LogP 0.35 TPSA 55.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC5701172 ZINC | 0.688 | 310.4 Da LogP 0.36 TPSA 64.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC5997861 ZINC | 0.688 | 398.5 Da LogP 0.40 TPSA 83.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC1706207 ZINC | 0.583 | 202.2 Da LogP 0.32 TPSA 69.7 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CC(=O)OCC(COC(C)=O)C(C)=O
|
| ZINC34111591 ZINC | 0.583 | 207.3 Da LogP -1.06 TPSA 62.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCN(CCO)CCO
|
| ZINC100017163 ZINC | 0.553 | 213.3 Da LogP 0.71 TPSA 99.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
C/C=C/CC(=N)NCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC19796052 ZINC | 0.553 | 219.2 Da LogP -1.73 TPSA 156.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N/C(=N\[N+](=O)[O-])NCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC21982226 ZINC | 0.553 | 219.2 Da LogP -1.73 TPSA 156.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N/C(=N\[N+](=O)[O-])NCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC34764844 ZINC | 0.550 | 206.3 Da LogP 1.09 TPSA 36.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
CCCOCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC2383745924 ZINC | 0.542 | 398.5 Da LogP -0.01 TPSA 94.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCC(CO)COCCOCCOCCOC
|
| ZINC5131766 ZINC | 0.538 | 224.3 Da LogP -1.26 TPSA 92.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC1529646 ZINC | 0.526 | 290.3 Da LogP -1.78 TPSA 185.8 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
N=C(NCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)O)N[C@@H](CC(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC2043460 ZINC | 0.526 | 214.3 Da LogP -0.52 TPSA 111.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
C=CCNC(=N)NCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3105913 ZINC | 0.526 | 240.2 Da LogP 1.22 TPSA 54.0 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCP(C)(=O)COCCOC
|
| ZINC115086873 ZINC | 0.524 | 209.2 Da LogP -1.08 TPSA 83.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
NOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC140264883 ZINC | 0.524 | 223.3 Da LogP -0.43 TPSA 72.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCON
|
| ZINC146143823 ZINC | 0.524 | 237.3 Da LogP -1.00 TPSA 83.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
NCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC1565503710 ZINC | 0.524 | 254.3 Da LogP -0.03 TPSA 57.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
OCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC1730666 ZINC | 0.524 | 208.2 Da LogP -1.46 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@@H](CSC[C@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC1730667 ZINC | 0.524 | 208.2 Da LogP -1.46 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@H](CSC[C@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC1730669 ZINC | 0.524 | 208.2 Da LogP -1.46 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@H](CSC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3055005 ZINC | 0.524 | 204.2 Da LogP -0.63 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@@H](CCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3055007 ZINC | 0.524 | 204.2 Da LogP -0.63 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@@H](CCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC3055010 ZINC | 0.524 | 204.2 Da LogP -0.63 TPSA 126.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
N[C@H](CCCC[C@@H](N)C(=O)O)C(=O)O
|
| ZINC33358855 ZINC | 0.524 | 207.3 Da LogP -0.36 TPSA 62.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCN
|
| ZINC38917157 ZINC | 0.524 | 210.3 Da LogP -0.04 TPSA 47.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
OCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC44583772 ZINC | 0.524 | 356.5 Da LogP 0.66 TPSA 64.6 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC5024003 ZINC | 0.524 | 251.3 Da LogP -0.34 TPSA 72.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCN
|
| ZINC575432090 ZINC | 0.524 | 355.4 Da LogP -0.38 TPSA 99.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCON
|
| ZINC575432265 ZINC | 0.524 | 399.5 Da LogP -0.36 TPSA 109.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCON
|
| ZINC71254558 ZINC | 0.524 | 444.6 Da LogP 0.70 TPSA 83.1 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC83253921 ZINC | 0.524 | 369.5 Da LogP -0.95 TPSA 110.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
NCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCO
|
| ZINC83253930 ZINC | 0.524 | 224.3 Da LogP 0.61 TPSA 36.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC83253936 ZINC | 0.524 | 383.5 Da LogP -0.29 TPSA 99.9 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCN
|
| ZINC90556279 ZINC | 0.524 | 295.4 Da LogP -0.33 TPSA 81.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCN
|
| ZINC90556287 ZINC | 0.524 | 268.4 Da LogP 0.63 TPSA 46.2 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC90741446 ZINC | 0.524 | 386.5 Da LogP 0.02 TPSA 84.8 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
OCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC90741447 ZINC | 0.524 | 298.4 Da LogP -0.01 TPSA 66.4 | ✓ Ro5 | ✓ Clean |
OCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCS
|
| ZINC96503353 ZINC | 0.524 | 471.6 Da LogP -0.26 TPSA 118.3 | 1 viol. | ✓ Clean |
COCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCOCCN
|
PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.