Protein profile

KP13_02578

Formate hydrogenlyase subunit 7

Genome: KpKP13

Gene: hycG AHE43039.1 Structure source: AlphaFold + ColabFold UniProt A0A0H3GWP2

Export view

Amino acids 255

Annotations 5

Features 7

PDB binders 10

Druggability 0.429

Overview

Basic information about this protein and its source genome.

Accession: KP13_02578
Assembly: Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae Kp13, complete sequence
Gene: hycG AHE43039.1
Status: annotated
Amino acids: 255
Structure source: AlphaFold + ColabFold

GO:0008137 Catalysis of the reaction: NADH + ubiquinone + 5 H+(in) = NAD+ + ubiquinol + 4 H+(out). GO:0051539 Binding to a 4 iron, 4 sulfur (4Fe-4S) cluster; this cluster consists of four iron atoms, with the inorganic sulfur atoms found between the irons and acting as bridging ligands. GO:0048038 Binding to a quinone, any member of a class of diketones derivable from aromatic compounds by conversion of two CH groups into CO groups with any necessary rearrangement of double bonds. GO:0051536 Binding to an iron-sulfur cluster, a combination of iron and sulfur atoms. GO:0046872 Binding to a metal ion.

Target profile

Computed evidence for target prioritization.

Human off-target: hit
Human identity (%): 37.086
Human E-value: 9.65e-28
Gut microbiome off-target: hit
Essential (DEG): N
DEG identity (%): 0.0
Localization: CytoplasmicMembrane
ColabFold pLDDT: 94.92

Selected Druggability evidence

AlphaFold / UniProt model

Selected Druggability is the FPocket score chosen for ranking using the curated structure priority. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so its visible pockets can differ.

FPocket 0.429

Structure A0A0H3GWP2

Pocket Pocket 7

P2Rank 0.232

Structure A0A0H3GWP2

Pocket Pocket 1

ColabFold model

FPocket 0.395 · Pocket 10

P2Rank 0.082 · Pocket 1

Core conservation Conserved core gene

Roary core

CoreCruncher core

Gut microbiome 505 / 4744 genomes with a hit

Normalized 0.106

Sequence

Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.

Functional Annotations

Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.

5 GO

Gene Ontology (GO)

GO:0008137 Catalysis of the reaction: NADH + ubiquinone + 5 H+(in) = NAD+ + ubiquinol + 4 H+(out).
GO:0051539 Binding to a 4 iron, 4 sulfur (4Fe-4S) cluster; this cluster consists of four iron atoms, with the inorganic sulfur atoms found between the irons and acting as bridging ligands.
GO:0048038 Binding to a quinone, any member of a class of diketones derivable from aromatic compounds by conversion of two CH groups into CO groups with any necessary rearrangement of double bonds.
GO:0051536 Binding to an iron-sulfur cluster, a combination of iron and sulfur atoms.
GO:0046872 Binding to a metal ion.

Sequence Features

Domain/signature hits from InterPro and related databases.

7 records

Show feature table

Start	End	DB	Term	Name
48	157	Pfam	PF01058	NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase, 20 Kd subunit
48	157	InterPro	IPR006137	NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase-like, 20kDa subunit
4	174	PANTHER	PTHR42989	HYDROGENASE-4 COMPONENT I
18	180	Gene3D	G3DSA:3.40.50.12280	-
36	169	SUPERFAMILY	SSF56770	HydA/Nqo6-like
131	147	ProSitePatterns	PS01150	Respiratory-chain NADH dehydrogenase 20 Kd subunit signature.
131	147	InterPro	IPR006138	NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, 20 Kd subunit

3D Structure

Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; predicted models typically cover the full protein.

Loading 3D structure...

Legend High Medium Low

Structural evidence

0 + 2

Experimental PDB entries and predicted models. Click Switch to display a different structure in the viewer.

Entry	Method	Resolution	Chain	Coverage	Links	Status
AlphaFold AF_A0A0H3GWP2	AlphaFold	—	—	full sequence	—	Viewing
ColabFold KP13_02578	ColabFold	—	—	full sequence	—	Loaded

Pocket details FPocket · P2Rank — toggle visibility and zoom from here, or open full viewer

Pockets (FPOCKET)

Showing top-ranked FPocket candidates by druggability. Druggability is color-coded: high (0.7 or higher), medium (0.4 to 0.69), low (below 0.4).

FPOCKET	Sticks	Spheres	Surfaces	Druggability	Labels	Zoom	Positions
7				0.429
12				0.283

Pockets (P2RANK)

Showing top-ranked P2Rank candidates by probability. Probability is color-coded per P2Rank calibration: high (≥ 0.5), medium (0.2 – 0.49), low (< 0.2).

P2RANK	Score	Probability
1	4.48	0.191
2	2.04	0.045
3	2.02	0.044

Pockets (FPOCKET)

Showing top-ranked FPocket candidates by druggability. Druggability is color-coded: high (0.7 or higher), medium (0.4 to 0.69), low (below 0.4).

FPOCKET	Sticks	Spheres	Surfaces	Druggability	Labels	Zoom	Positions
10				0.395

Pockets (P2RANK)

Showing top-ranked P2Rank candidates by probability. Probability is color-coded per P2Rank calibration: high (≥ 0.5), medium (0.2 – 0.49), low (< 0.2).

P2RANK	Sticks	Spheres	Surfaces	Score	Probability	Labels	Zoom	Positions
1				2.72	0.082
2				1.26	0.013

Ligand evidence

Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.

61 records

Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in TPW, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.

No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.

Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.

Ligand	Source crystal	UniProt (homolog)	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
3PE	6QC5	W5PPP6	748.1 Da LogP 12.06 TPSA 134.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OCCN)OC…`
8Q1	5XTB	O75251	540.7 Da LogP 3.29 TPSA 162.3	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@@H](C(C)(C)…`
CDL	6G2J	Q9DC70	1464.1 Da LogP 23.31 TPSA 242.6	3 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)([O-])OCC(…`
EHZ	6G2J	Q9DC70	584.7 Da LogP 3.04 TPSA 182.5	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCC[C@@H](CC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@@H]…`
FES	6X89	A0A1S3U8J5	175.8 Da LogP 1.29 TPSA 0.0	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`S1[Fe]S[Fe]1`
NFU	6CFW	Q8U0Z8	195.6 Da LogP -0.25 TPSA 64.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C(=O)[Fe](C#N)(C#N)[Ni]`
PC1	6G2J	Q9DC70	790.2 Da LogP 12.17 TPSA 111.2	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)([O-])…`
PEE	5XTH	O75251	744.0 Da LogP 11.61 TPSA 134.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)OCCN…`
PLX	5XTD	O75251	767.1 Da LogP 11.61 TPSA 114.7	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC[C@@H](O)O[C@H](CO[C@@H](CCCCC…`
ZMP	6QC5	W5PPP6	568.7 Da LogP 4.07 TPSA 162.3	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)SCCNC(=O)CCNC(=O)[C@H](C(C)(C…`

Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.

Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

Ligand	UniProt (homolog)	pchembl	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
DXH	O75251	8.51	503.5 Da LogP 5.75 TPSA 97.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Cc1ccc(cc1Nc2c3cnn(c3nc(n2)c4cccnc4)C)C(=O)Nc5c…`

Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).

Ligand	Tanimoto	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
ZINC102190506	1.000	467.5 Da LogP 4.25 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CC…`
ZINC102190512	1.000	467.5 Da LogP 4.25 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)C…`
ZINC27416437	0.976	411.4 Da LogP 2.69 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC33902364	0.976	411.4 Da LogP 2.69 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(=O)CCC…`
ZINC13544781	0.780	482.6 Da LogP 4.22 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C…`
ZINC13544783	0.780	482.6 Da LogP 4.22 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC13543439	0.760	454.5 Da LogP 3.44 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC13543441	0.760	454.5 Da LogP 3.44 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)O…`
ZINC102190945	0.739	411.5 Da LogP 3.29 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840692	0.739	425.5 Da LogP 3.68 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840693	0.739	425.5 Da LogP 3.68 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840704	0.739	453.6 Da LogP 4.46 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC32840705	0.739	453.6 Da LogP 4.46 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC95635984	0.739	397.4 Da LogP 2.90 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN`
ZINC102191119	0.729	498.6 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 148.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@@H](O)CO…`
ZINC58649551	0.729	498.6 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 148.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@H](O)CO)…`
ZINC36178999	0.727	424.5 Da LogP 4.27 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC36179002	0.727	424.5 Da LogP 4.27 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC13543394	0.708	455.4 Da LogP 2.15 TPSA 171.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C@H](N)C(=O)…`
ZINC33822387	0.706	426.5 Da LogP 2.66 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)O…`
ZINC33822389	0.706	426.5 Da LogP 2.66 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)…`
ZINC5820131	0.705	368.4 Da LogP 2.71 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC5820134	0.705	368.4 Da LogP 2.71 TPSA 119.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC1501016364	0.654	465.6 Da LogP 4.63 TPSA 128.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC/C=C\CCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O…`
ZINC12834352	0.635	398.4 Da LogP 1.88 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)OC…`
ZINC12834353	0.635	398.4 Da LogP 1.88 TPSA 108.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)OC(…`
ZINC4521879	0.634	386.5 Da LogP 4.73 TPSA 78.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OCC(COC(=O)CCCCC)OC(=O)CCCCC`
ZINC102189757	0.582	454.6 Da LogP 4.04 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+…`
ZINC13544128	0.582	370.4 Da LogP 1.70 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C…`
ZINC14880038	0.582	440.5 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC14880039	0.582	440.5 Da LogP 3.65 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC15297567	0.582	468.6 Da LogP 4.43 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[…`
ZINC32789157	0.582	412.5 Da LogP 2.87 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C…`
ZINC32789161	0.582	412.5 Da LogP 2.87 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)…`
ZINC32822149	0.582	468.6 Da LogP 4.43 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+…`
ZINC32822162	0.582	482.6 Da LogP 4.82 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC…`
ZINC32822163	0.582	482.6 Da LogP 4.82 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N…`
ZINC44305349	0.582	454.6 Da LogP 4.04 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N…`
ZINC44405718	0.582	398.5 Da LogP 2.48 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C…`
ZINC44405722	0.582	426.5 Da LogP 3.26 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+]…`
ZINC85576534	0.582	384.4 Da LogP 2.09 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)…`
ZINC36079847	0.578	344.5 Da LogP 4.15 TPSA 72.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC8214428	0.578	344.5 Da LogP 4.15 TPSA 72.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](CO)OC(=O)CCCCCCC`
ZINC13521162	0.574	299.2 Da LogP -0.43 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CC(=O)OC[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(C)=O`
ZINC3798545	0.574	299.2 Da LogP -0.43 TPSA 134.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CC(=O)OC[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OCCN)OC(C)=O`
ZINC4521911	0.571	344.4 Da LogP 3.56 TPSA 78.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCC(=O)OCC(COC(=O)CCCC)OC(=O)CCCC`
ZINC13507210	0.564	356.4 Da LogP 1.31 TPSA 102.3	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@](=O)(O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C`
ZINC53683910	0.560	484.6 Da LogP 3.86 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[…`
ZINC62592204	0.560	484.6 Da LogP 3.86 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC…`
ZINC96094841	0.560	456.5 Da LogP 3.08 TPSA 142.8	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)CO[P@@](=O)(O)OC[C…`

PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.