Protein target profile

KP13_31943

Asparagine synthetase B glutamine-hydrolyzing

Genome: KpKP13 Gene: AHE45696.1 asnB 3D evidence: AlphaFold DB model + ColabFold model UniProt A0A0H3GQ75

Export view

Length 554

Pocket druggability 0.995

Direct ligand evidence 0 62 total records

Functional annotation 1 EC 4 GO

Target summary

Promising target candidate with multiple supporting evidence streams.

Automated synthesis of the evidence currently loaded. Review the underlying records before prioritizing this protein.

Main supporting evidence

Independent pocket support: FPocket + P2Rank Both predictors report a high-scoring binding site (FPocket 0.99, P2Rank 0.97). Use the 3D pocket comparison to verify whether they identify the same site. Strong predicted binding pocket FPocket selected-pocket score 0.99. This is a computational pocket signal, not binding validation. Second pocket predictor agrees P2Rank predicted binding-site probability 0.97. Structure available AlphaFold DB model + ColabFold model Review the complete evidence below

Risks to review

Evidence gaps

No metabolic context No SBML/network-derived reaction evidence is loaded for this protein.

Terms and data sources used on this page

PDB: experimentally determined structures from the Protein Data Bank. These are the strongest structural evidence, but may cover only part of the protein.

AlphaFold DB model: a precomputed predicted structure downloaded from AlphaFold Database/UniProt, not an experiment performed here.

ColabFold model: a predicted structure generated for this workspace; interpret it with coverage and confidence.

pLDDT: confidence score for predicted structures. High values support local geometry; low values mean the region should not drive pocket interpretation.

FPocket / P2Rank: software tools that predict possible ligand-binding pockets on a 3D structure. They are useful screening signals, not experimental validation.

Druggability: a pocket-based estimate of whether a small molecule could bind productively. It does not mean a drug already exists.

PDB ligand: a compound observed in an experimental structure. Direct same-protein records are stronger than homolog-transferred records.

ChEMBL: a public database of measured compound bioactivity. Direct entries are stronger than entries transferred from similar proteins.

ZINC: a purchasable-compound database. Here it marks proposed candidates from chemical similarity, not measured binders.

LigQ / LigQ_2: an internal Target pipeline step that gathers PDB, ChEMBL, and ZINC ligand evidence for each protein.

Off-target: sequence similarity to proteins we prefer not to hit, such as human proteins or beneficial gut microbiome proteins.

DEG: Database of Essential Genes. A match suggests the protein resembles genes known to be essential in other organisms.

Roary / CoreCruncher: pan-genome tools used to decide whether a gene is core across analyzed strains or accessory/strain-specific.

EC / GO: functional annotations: EC describes enzyme reactions; GO describes biological process, molecular function, or cellular component.

KEGG pathway: a curated metabolic route label used here to group reactions imported from the metabolic model.

Chokepoint: a metabolic reaction that is the only producer or consumer of a metabolite in the imported model.

Prioritization evidence

Selectivity, essentiality, structural confidence, conservation, and predicted binding-site evidence.

Off-target risk

Human off-target: Hit
Human identity (%): 37.5 Lower values reduce human off-target concern.
Human E-value: 1.28e-102
Gut microbiome similarity: 8.3% of screened genomes Lower prevalence suggests narrower overlap with the screened gut microbiome.

Essentiality

Essential (DEG): N
DEG identity (%): 0.0 Higher values support similarity to known essential genes.

Localization

Localization: Cytoplasmic

Structure confidence

ColabFold pLDDT: 96.23 0-100 confidence; >70 supports local structural interpretation.

Binding-site evidence

AlphaFold DB / UniProt model

The selected pocket score is the FPocket value used for ranking after applying the curated structure priority. It estimates small-molecule pocket quality; it is not experimental binding evidence. The 3D viewer may show a different loaded structure, so visible pockets can differ.

FPocket 0.995

Structure A0A0H3GQ75

Pocket Pocket 1

P2Rank 0.973

Structure A0A0H3GQ75

Pocket Pocket 1

ColabFold model

FPocket 0.996 · Pocket 1

P2Rank 0.986 · Pocket 1

Core conservation Accessory gene

Roary core

CoreCruncher accessory

Gut microbiome 396 / 4744 genomes with a hit

Prevalence 8.3%

Cross-references

External database identifiers for this protein, its structures, ligands, and metabolic reactions.

Sequence

UniProt A0A0H3GQ75

Chemistry

ChEMBL CHEMBL1627258 ChEMBL CHEMBL2153507 ChEMBL CHEMBL2153508 ChEMBL CHEMBL3250951

Sequence

Primary amino-acid sequence viewer.

MCSIFGVLDIKTDAGELRKKALELSRLMRHRGPDWSGVYASDKAILAHERLSIVDVNAGAQPLYNAEKTHALAVNGEIYNHQALRAEYGDRYQFQTGSDCEVILALYQEKGPEFLDDLQGMFAFALYDSEKDAYLIGRDHIGIIPLYMGHDEHGNFYVASEMKALVPVCRTIKEFPAGSYLWSKDGEIRQYYQRDWFDYDAVKDNVTDKNELRQALEESVKSHLMSDVPYGVLLSGGLDSSVISAITKKFAARRVEDQERSEAWWPQLHSFAVGLEGSPDLKAAQEVANHLGTVHHEIHFTVQEGLDAIRDVIYHIETYDVTTIRASTPMYLMSRKIKAMGIKMVLSGEGSDEVFGGYLYFHKAPNAKELHEETVRKLQALHMFDCARANKAMSAWGVEARVPFLDKKFLDVAMRINPQDKMCGNGKMEKHILRECFESYLPASVAWRQKEQFSDGVGYSWIDTLKEVAAKQISDQQLETASFRFPYNTPTSKEGYLYREIFEELFPLPSAAECVPGGPSVACSSAKAIEWDEAFKTMNDPSGRAVGVHQSAYK

Functional annotations

Enzyme classification and Gene Ontology terms linked to this protein.

1 EC 4 GO

Enzyme Commission (EC)

6.3.5.4

Gene Ontology (GO)

GO:0004066 Catalysis of the reaction: ATP + L-aspartate + L-glutamine = AMP + diphosphate + L-asparagine + L-glutamate.
GO:0006529 OBSOLETE. The chemical reactions and pathways resulting in the formation of asparagine, 2-amino-3-carbamoylpropanoic acid.
GO:0005829 The part of the cytoplasm that does not contain organelles but which does contain other particulate matter, such as protein complexes.
GO:0005524 Binding to ATP, adenosine 5'-triphosphate, a universally important coenzyme and enzyme regulator.

Sequence domains and features

Domain and signature matches imported from InterPro and related databases.

26 records

Show feature table

Start	End	DB	Term	Name
48	166	Pfam	PF13537	Glutamine amidotransferase domain
48	166	InterPro	IPR017932	Glutamine amidotransferase type 2 domain
361	507	PIRSF	PIRSF001589	Asn_synthetase_glu-h
361	507	InterPro	IPR006426	Asparagine synthase, glutamine-hydrolyzing
1	368	PIRSF	PIRSF001589	Asn_synthetase_glu-h
1	368	InterPro	IPR006426	Asparagine synthase, glutamine-hydrolyzing
194	514	FunFam	G3DSA:3.40.50.620:FF:000031	Asparagine synthase B
1	554	PANTHER	PTHR11772	ASPARAGINE SYNTHETASE
2	373	NCBIfam	TIGR01536	asparagine synthase (glutamine-hydrolyzing)
2	373	InterPro	IPR006426	Asparagine synthase, glutamine-hydrolyzing
2	193	CDD	cd00712	AsnB
2	193	InterPro	IPR033738	Asparagine synthase, N-terminal domain
210	479	SUPERFAMILY	SSF52402	Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like
194	514	Gene3D	G3DSA:3.40.50.620	HUPs
194	514	InterPro	IPR014729	Rossmann-like alpha/beta/alpha sandwich fold
2	186	ProSiteProfiles	PS51278	Glutamine amidotransferase type 2 domain profile.
2	186	InterPro	IPR017932	Glutamine amidotransferase type 2 domain
213	456	CDD	cd01991	Asn_Synthase_B_C
213	456	InterPro	IPR001962	Asparagine synthase
2	193	Gene3D	G3DSA:3.60.20.10	Glutamine Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate, subunit 1, domain 1
2	193	InterPro	IPR029055	Nucleophile aminohydrolases, N-terminal
1	196	SUPERFAMILY	SSF56235	N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolases (Ntn hydrolases)
1	196	InterPro	IPR029055	Nucleophile aminohydrolases, N-terminal
211	366	Pfam	PF00733	Asparagine synthase
211	366	InterPro	IPR001962	Asparagine synthase
2	193	FunFam	G3DSA:3.60.20.10:FF:000037	Asparagine synthetase B

3D structure

Selected loaded structure. Experimental PDB entries may cover only a portion of the sequence; AlphaFold DB and ColabFold models typically cover the full protein but remain computational predictions.

Download VMD script Full viewer

Loading 3D structure...

Drag to rotate — click the view, then scroll to zoom.

Pocket score High Medium Low

How colors and pocket overlays are used

Uniform protein color marks the displayed model as a single molecular object.

Experimental PDB structures may be colored by chain to distinguish subunits or copies present in the file.

Pocket colors and alpha spheres are evidence overlays for predicted binding cavities; they are not alternative protein chains.

'Alpha spheres' is FPocket's own cavity-shape geometry, imported when available and aligned with the loaded structure.

'Pocket atoms'/'Predicted site atoms' show the pocket's residue atoms instead: P2Rank reports residues rather than alpha spheres, and FPocket falls back to this when alpha-sphere geometry is unavailable or doesn't align.

'No pocket geometry' means neither alpha spheres nor residue-position data could be found for that pocket; the layer just highlights the same residues as 'Nearby residues'.

Pocket details Inspect a specific pocket, or open the full viewer

Binding pockets · FPocket

Druggability: high ≥ 0.7 · medium 0.4–0.69 · low < 0.4

Site 1 FPocket #1

0.995

Likely same site as P2Rank 1 4.5 Å 41 shared residues 85% of smaller site

Unusual size

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 2 FPocket #28

0.271

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 3 FPocket #2

0.268

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2

Site 1 P2Rank #1

0.973

Likely same site as FPocket 1 4.5 Å 41 shared residues 85% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 2 P2Rank #2

0.106

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 3 P2Rank #3

0.099

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 4 P2Rank #4

0.088

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 5 P2Rank #5

0.05

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Residue sets

UniProt: Active site:2-2 For GATase activity

UniProt: Binding site:233-233

UniProt: Binding site:273-273

UniProt: Binding site:347-348

UniProt: Binding site:99-99

UniProt: Site:349-349 Important for beta-aspartyl-AMP intermediate formation

Binding pockets · P2Rank

Probability: high ≥ 0.5 · medium 0.2–0.49 · low < 0.2

Site 1 P2Rank #1

0.986

Likely same site as FPocket 1 3.1 Å 45 shared residues 90% of smaller site

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 2 P2Rank #2

0.185

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 3 P2Rank #3

0.097

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 4 P2Rank #4

0.095

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

Site 5 P2Rank #5

0.046

Show in viewer

Surrounding area

All structural evidence 0 experimental · 2 predicted

Structural evidence

0 + 2

Experimental PDB entries plus predicted AlphaFold DB or ColabFold models. Click Switch to display a different loaded structure in the viewer.

Entry	Method	Resolution	Chain	Coverage	Links	Status
AlphaFold DB AF_A0A0H3GQ75	AlphaFold DB	—	—	full sequence	—	Viewing
ColabFold KP13_31943	ColabFold	—	—	full sequence	—	Loaded

Ligand evidence

Ligands grouped by evidence source. PDB ligands keep the source crystal visible, and loaded crystals can be opened directly in the structure viewer.

62 records

Chemistry signal

Structural and bioactivity evidence are both available for this target.

Direct evidence 0 same-protein records

Transferred evidence 12 records from similar proteins

Structural ligands 8 0 loaded crystals

Measured bioactivity 4 direct and transferred ChEMBL records

Proposed compounds 50 similarity-based ZINC candidates

Best available ligand signal

APC PDB via homolog 505.2 Da · LogP -1.52 · TPSA 269.9 Open detail RCSB PDB

CMA PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

IOT PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

IUM PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

ONL PDB via homolog Detail RCSB PDB

Highest-confidence structural evidence: ligands co-crystallized with this exact protein. If the source PDB is loaded in Target, use Open crystal to inspect it in the structure viewer.

No PDB structure with a co-crystallized ligand found for this exact protein.

Structural evidence inferred from similar proteins. The source crystal indicates where the ligand was observed; the UniProt column identifies the homologous protein carrying that ligand.

Ligand	Source crystal	UniProt (homolog)	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
APC RCSB PDB	1JGT	P0DJQ7	505.2 Da LogP -1.52 TPSA 269.9	3 viol.	✓ Clean	`c1nc(c2c(n1)n(cn2)[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O3)…`
CMA RCSB PDB	1JGT	P0DJQ7	246.3 Da LogP -1.23 TPSA 148.5	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`C(C[C@@H](C(=O)O)NCCC(=O)O)CNC(=N)N`
IOT RCSB PDB	1MBZ	P0DJQ7	561.4 Da LogP -3.01 TPSA 303.4	3 viol.	✓ Clean	`c1nc(c2c(n1)n(cn2)[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O3)…`
IUM RCSB PDB	1CT9	P22106	270.0 Da LogP -2.38 TPSA 46.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`[O-][U+4][O-]`
ONL RCSB PDB	6GQ3	P08243	145.2 Da LogP -0.23 TPSA 80.4	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`CC(=O)CC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N`
PCX RCSB PDB	1MC1	P0DJQ7	228.3 Da LogP -1.06 TPSA 119.5	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`[H]/N=C(/N)\NCCC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N1CCC1=O`
POP RCSB PDB	1MB9	P0DJQ7	176.0 Da LogP -2.08 TPSA 129.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`O[P@@](=O)([O-])O[P@@](=O)(O)[O-]`
SSC RCSB PDB	1Q19	Q9XB61	173.2 Da LogP -0.33 TPSA 86.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`C1C[C@H](N[C@@H]1CC(=O)O)C(=O)O`

Experimental bioactivity from ChEMBL measured directly on this protein. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

No ChEMBL bioactivity data found for this exact protein.

Bioactivity inferred from similar proteins in ChEMBL. Score = pchembl (−log Ki/IC₅₀; higher = more potent).

Ligand	UniProt (homolog)	pchembl	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
CHEMBL1627258 ChEMBL	P08243	8.60 ~2.5 nM	495.4 Da LogP -2.35 TPSA 264.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`C[S+]([O-])(C[C@H](N)C(=O)O)=NP(=O)(O)OC[C@H]1O…`
CHEMBL2153507 ChEMBL	P08243	8.10 ~7.9 nM	451.4 Da LogP -1.80 TPSA 227.3	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`C[S+]([O-])(CCN)=NP(=O)(O)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc…`
CHEMBL2153508 ChEMBL	P08243	6.51 ~309.0 nM	480.4 Da LogP -1.28 TPSA 238.6	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`C[S+]([O-])(CCC(=O)O)=NP(=O)(O)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](…`
CHEMBL3250951 ChEMBL	P49088	—	184.2 Da LogP -2.29 TPSA 129.7	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`N[C@@H](CS(=O)(=O)NO)C(=O)O`

Proposed virtual-screening candidates from ZINC. Score = Tanimoto similarity to a known binder (0–1; higher = more similar).

Ligand	Tanimoto	MW · LogP · TPSA	Lipinski	PAINS	SMILES
ZINC1530510 ZINC	1.000	246.3 Da LogP -1.23 TPSA 148.5	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NCCC(=O)O)C(=O)O`
ZINC105469665 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)CP(=O…`
ZINC13527614 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O)…`
ZINC219330894 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O)…`
ZINC3873852 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O)…`
ZINC3873853 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O…`
ZINC3873854 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O)…`
ZINC3873855 ZINC	0.855	425.2 Da LogP -1.64 TPSA 223.4	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)CP(=O…`
ZINC12360002 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=O…`
ZINC12360703 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=O…`
ZINC12503599 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=O…`
ZINC16546165 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OP(=O)(…`
ZINC31977053 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OP(=O)…`
ZINC4806433 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=O…`
ZINC53683898 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=…`
ZINC8586019 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OP(=O)…`
ZINC8586020 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=…`
ZINC8586021 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=O…`
ZINC8586022 ZINC	0.821	427.2 Da LogP -1.75 TPSA 232.6	2 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OP(=…`
ZINC13518964 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@H](…`
ZINC1571045 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H]…`
ZINC1842158 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@H](O…`
ZINC2046931 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@H](…`
ZINC2126310 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC3201891 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H]…`
ZINC3201893 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC3830180 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC3860156 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC3977897 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@H]1O[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@@H](O…`
ZINC4806442 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@H](O…`
ZINC8613167 ZINC	0.815	347.2 Da LogP -1.86 TPSA 186.1	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(=O)(O)O)[C@H](O…`
ZINC4096224 ZINC	0.768	346.2 Da LogP -1.90 TPSA 191.9	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](N)(=O)O)[C@@…`
ZINC105372833 ZINC	0.750	345.3 Da LogP -1.93 TPSA 197.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(N)(N)=O)[C@H](O…`
ZINC105372837 ZINC	0.750	345.3 Da LogP -1.93 TPSA 197.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(N)(N)=O)[C@H](O…`
ZINC17107643 ZINC	0.750	345.3 Da LogP -1.93 TPSA 197.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(N)(N)=O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC204538551 ZINC	0.750	345.3 Da LogP -1.93 TPSA 197.6	✓ Ro5	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](COP(N)(N)=O)[C@@H](…`
ZINC1529261 ZINC	0.722	304.3 Da LogP -1.39 TPSA 185.8	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`N=C(N)NCCC[C@@H](N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)C(=O)O`
ZINC1529262 ZINC	0.722	304.3 Da LogP -1.39 TPSA 185.8	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`N=C(N)NCCC[C@@H](N[C@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)C(=O)O`
ZINC1529939 ZINC	0.722	304.3 Da LogP -1.39 TPSA 185.8	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)C(=O)O`
ZINC1529940 ZINC	0.722	304.3 Da LogP -1.39 TPSA 185.8	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](N[C@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)C(=O)O`
ZINC5615251 ZINC	0.712	375.3 Da LogP -0.55 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COP(=O)(OC)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[C@…`
ZINC5615253 ZINC	0.712	375.3 Da LogP -0.55 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COP(=O)(OC)OC[C@@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[C…`
ZINC5615258 ZINC	0.712	375.3 Da LogP -0.55 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COP(=O)(OC)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[C@…`
ZINC5615263 ZINC	0.712	375.3 Da LogP -0.55 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`COP(=O)(OC)OC[C@@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[C…`
ZINC12503850 ZINC	0.705	427.3 Da LogP -2.04 TPSA 229.4	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OS(=O)…`
ZINC141161066 ZINC	0.705	427.3 Da LogP -2.04 TPSA 229.4	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OS(=O)…`
ZINC141163786 ZINC	0.705	427.3 Da LogP -2.04 TPSA 229.4	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@](=O)(O)OS(=O)…`
ZINC4228246 ZINC	0.705	427.3 Da LogP -2.04 TPSA 229.4	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`Nc1ncnc2c1ncn2[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO[P@@](=O)(O)OS(=O…`
ZINC1582675 ZINC	0.700	403.3 Da LogP 0.23 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCOP(=O)(OCC)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[…`
ZINC5486730 ZINC	0.700	403.3 Da LogP 0.23 TPSA 164.1	1 viol.	✓ Clean	`CCOP(=O)(OCC)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](n2cnc3c(N)ncnc32)[…`

PDB and ChEMBL records on this protein are shown in full. ChEMBL records from similar proteins are capped at the top 100 per protein (by pchembl) and ZINC at the top 50 (Tanimoto ≥ 0.5). ADME columns are descriptor-based screening flags, not experimental toxicity results.